200 years not 'cruel and unusual punishment' in child porn case

From Brongersma
Revision as of 11:15, 8 March 2019 by Admin (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A 200-year prison term for a man convicted of possessing 20 separate items of child pornography is not constitutionally excessive, the state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday. In a 4-1 ruling, the majority said the state Legislature is free to decide that those guilty of this crime must serve at least 10 years in prison. And they concluded lawmakers also are free to mandate that the sentences be served consecutively, with no possibility of early release -- effectively making it a life term.

But the decision drew a stinging dissent from Justice Rebecca Berch. She pointed out that the high school teacher in this case -- who did not produce the materials but simply downloaded them from the Internet -- could serve less time for a crime spree that included second degree murder because the law allows that sentence to be served concurrent with other convictions. Morton R. Berger, who was a history teacher at Cortez High School, was arrested four years ago based on his possession of photographs, computer video files and computer photo files of children, all younger than 15, in sex acts. Prosecutors dismissed 15 counts but got convictions on the remaining 20. Based on requirements of state law, Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Ruth Hilliard sentenced Berger to the minimum 10 years consecutive terms on each count. He appealed, arguing that violates the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment." But Justice Scott Bales, writing the majority ruling, refused to view this as a 200-year prison term but instead as a challenge to the 10-year minimum sentence required for conviction. And he said that kind of prison term is not excessive. [...]

Berch also said state laws allow for concurrent sentences when someone is convicted of second degree murder and other offenses. And she said that 10-year minimum is longer than the presumed sentence for rape or aggravated assault -- and that Berger would serve no more time for actually molesting a child. Finally, she also chided colleagues for refusing to measure this as a 200-year prison term for a crime that directly harmed no one.

source: Article '200 years not 'cruel and unusual punishment' in child porn case' by Howard Fischer; www.azstarnet.com/sn/hourlyupdate/128547.php; www.azstarnet.com (capitol media services); 10 May 2006