Academics defend Flanagan's child porn views as public debate: Difference between revisions

From Brongersma
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "Some academics are coming to the defence of former Stephen Harper strategist Tom Flanagan. They say the well-respected political scientist should not have been so widely conde...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
Flanagan was giving a community lecture in Lethbridge when he questioned whether people should be jailed for viewing child porn.<br>
Flanagan was giving a community lecture in Lethbridge when he questioned whether people should be jailed for viewing child porn.<br>
<br>
<br>
<i>source: Article 'Academics defend Flanagan's child porn views as public debate'; www.globalnews.ca/academics+ defend+flanagans+child+porn+ views+as+public+debate/ 6442819523/story.html; Global News (The Canadian Press); 1 March 2013</i>
<i>source: Article 'Academics defend Flanagan's child porn views as public debate'; www.globalnews.ca/academics+defend+flanagans+child+porn+views+as+public+debate/6442819523/story.html; Global News (The Canadian Press); 1 March 2013</i>


[[Category:Tom Flanagan]]
[[Category:Tom Flanagan]]

Latest revision as of 20:56, 26 May 2017

Some academics are coming to the defence of former Stephen Harper strategist Tom Flanagan. They say the well-respected political scientist should not have been so widely condemned for his comments on child pornography. [...]

Flanagan was giving a community lecture in Lethbridge when he questioned whether people should be jailed for viewing child porn.

source: Article 'Academics defend Flanagan's child porn views as public debate'; www.globalnews.ca/academics+defend+flanagans+child+porn+views+as+public+debate/6442819523/story.html; Global News (The Canadian Press); 1 March 2013