Judge under fire on teen sex comment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "A Victorian judge came under fire yesterday after saying a 13-year-old girl was a "willing party" to sex with a man twice her age. "(The victim) was a willing party to the sex...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[Category:Judges]] | [[Category:Judges]] | ||
[[Category:Rechters]] | [[Category:Rechters]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Australia]] | ||
[[Category:Australië]] | [[Category:Australië]] | ||
[[Category:William White]] | [[Category:William White]] | ||
[[Category:Sexual contact man with minor]] | [[Category:Sexual contact man with minor]] | ||
[[Category:Seksueel contact man met minderjarige]] | [[Category:Seksueel contact man met minderjarige]] | ||
Revision as of 09:16, 9 October 2014
A Victorian judge came under fire yesterday after saying a 13-year-old girl was a "willing party" to sex with a man twice her age. "(The victim) was a willing party to the sexual activity," County Court judge William White said when sentencing the man to more than four years' jail for numerous child-sex offences. Judge White also said the victim had not submitted a victim impact statement to the court because she was "compliant" and had allowed the man to perform sexual acts on her during a two-month period.
source: 'Judge under fire on teen sex comment' by Sarah-Jane Collins; www.theage.com.au/news/ national/judge-under-fire-on- teen-sex-comment/2008/ 04/02/1206851013831.html; theage.com.au; 3 April 2008