Lowering the age of consent merits open debate, not closed minds: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "I would support a reduction in the age of consent to 14 but only if it was accompanied by earlier, better quality sex education in schools. [...] This education should include...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I would support a reduction in the age of consent to 14 but only if it was accompanied by earlier, better quality sex education in schools. [...] This education should include assertiveness training to encourage young people to say no to unwanted sexual advances and to report abusers. I do not support adults having sex with children. Alternatively, we could keep the age of consent at 16 but institute a policy of not prosecuting sex involving young people under 16, providing there is no more than two years difference in their ages.<br> | I would support a reduction in the age of consent to 14 but only if it was accompanied by earlier, better quality sex education in schools. [...] This education should include assertiveness training to encourage young people to say no to unwanted sexual advances and to report abusers. I do not support adults having sex with children. Alternatively, we could keep the age of consent at 16 but institute a policy of not prosecuting sex involving young people under 16, providing there is no more than two years difference in their ages.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<i>source: Article 'Lowering the age of consent merits open debate, not closed minds' by Peter Tatchell; news.uk.msn.com/socialvoices/ age-of-consent-merits-open-debate- not-closed-minds-463778/; socialvoices.uk.msn.com | <i>source: Article 'Lowering the age of consent merits open debate, not closed minds' by Peter Tatchell; news.uk.msn.com/socialvoices/ age-of-consent-merits-open-debate- not-closed-minds-463778/; socialvoices.uk.msn.com; 10 May 2013</i> | ||
[[Category:Peter Tatchell]] | [[Category:Peter Tatchell]] |
Revision as of 14:55, 10 May 2013
I would support a reduction in the age of consent to 14 but only if it was accompanied by earlier, better quality sex education in schools. [...] This education should include assertiveness training to encourage young people to say no to unwanted sexual advances and to report abusers. I do not support adults having sex with children. Alternatively, we could keep the age of consent at 16 but institute a policy of not prosecuting sex involving young people under 16, providing there is no more than two years difference in their ages.
source: Article 'Lowering the age of consent merits open debate, not closed minds' by Peter Tatchell; news.uk.msn.com/socialvoices/ age-of-consent-merits-open-debate- not-closed-minds-463778/; socialvoices.uk.msn.com; 10 May 2013