Why possession of child porn must be re-legalised: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Remember that possession of child pornography was legal in most parts of the world until just a decade or so ago (1999 in Sweden). The Swedish Association of Journalists still...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Remember that possession of child pornography was legal in most parts of the world until just a decade or so ago (1999 in Sweden). The Swedish Association of Journalists still is against the ban. That's why Falkvinge makes a point of using the word "re-legalize" instead of "legalize".<br> | Remember that possession of child pornography was legal in most parts of the world until just a decade or so ago (1999 in Sweden). The Swedish Association of Journalists still is against the ban. That's why Falkvinge makes a point of using the word "re-legalize" instead of "legalize".<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<i>source: Article 'Why possession of child porn must be re-legalised'; destroyerjournal.com/2012/09/ 10/why-possession-of-child- porn-must-be-re-legalised/; Destroyer Journal; 10 September 2012</i> | <i>source: Article 'Why possession of child porn must be re-legalised'; destroyerjournal.com/2012/09/10/why-possession-of-child-porn-must-be-re-legalised/; Destroyer Journal; 10 September 2012</i> | ||
[[Category:Sex laws]] | [[Category:Sex laws]] | ||
Revision as of 13:57, 24 April 2015
Remember that possession of child pornography was legal in most parts of the world until just a decade or so ago (1999 in Sweden). The Swedish Association of Journalists still is against the ban. That's why Falkvinge makes a point of using the word "re-legalize" instead of "legalize".
source: Article 'Why possession of child porn must be re-legalised'; destroyerjournal.com/2012/09/10/why-possession-of-child-porn-must-be-re-legalised/; Destroyer Journal; 10 September 2012