Karl Anderson: Sex destroys beauty: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "[Interviewer:] You urge people to send you old magazines that may be "kiddie porn". And some of the ads seem fishy.<br> <br> [Karl Andersson, editor of <i>Destroyer</i>:] Yes,...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[Karl Andersson, editor of <i>Destroyer</i>:] Yes, some of the magazines that I urge people to sens me - instead of throwing them away - are considered kiddie porn nowadays. But what is kiddie porn? Even Donatello's <i>David</i> can be considered kiddie porn in some countries, and certainly Wilhelm von Gloeden's pictures, which were even burnt in the fascist thirties. Nowadays the owners of these magazines burn them themselves in their homes. There is a red line running through these actions: pictures of teenage boys have been denounced by the society, and so for no other reason than that the observer is a man. Homophobia, not concern about the children, lurks behind the kiddie porn legislations. Every intelligent social critic should fight them, or at least put the light on their real objectives.<br> | [Karl Andersson, editor of <i>Destroyer</i>:] Yes, some of the magazines that I urge people to sens me - instead of throwing them away - are considered kiddie porn nowadays. But what is kiddie porn? Even Donatello's <i>David</i> can be considered kiddie porn in some countries, and certainly Wilhelm von Gloeden's pictures, which were even burnt in the fascist thirties. Nowadays the owners of these magazines burn them themselves in their homes. There is a red line running through these actions: pictures of teenage boys have been denounced by the society, and so for no other reason than that the observer is a man. Homophobia, not concern about the children, lurks behind the kiddie porn legislations. Every intelligent social critic should fight them, or at least put the light on their real objectives.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<i>source: Interview 'Sex destroys beauty' by Jaakko Stenros; Interviewing Karl Andersson; blog.destroyerjournal.com/ images/kasino2low.jpg; Kasino A4; issue #5; April 2007</i> | <i>source: Interview 'Sex destroys beauty' by Jaakko Stenros; Interviewing Karl Andersson; blog.destroyerjournal.com/images/kasino2low.jpg; Kasino A4; issue #5; April 2007</i> | ||
[[Category:Karl Andersson]] | [[Category:Karl Andersson]] | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
[[Category:Donatello]] | [[Category:Donatello]] | ||
[[Category:Wilhelm von Gloeden]] | [[Category:Wilhelm von Gloeden]] | ||
[[Category:Gay hatred]] | [[Category:Homophobia/Gay hatred]] | ||
[[Category:Homofobie/Homohaat]] | [[Category:Homofobie/Homohaat]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:52, 18 August 2014
[Interviewer:] You urge people to send you old magazines that may be "kiddie porn". And some of the ads seem fishy.
[Karl Andersson, editor of Destroyer:] Yes, some of the magazines that I urge people to sens me - instead of throwing them away - are considered kiddie porn nowadays. But what is kiddie porn? Even Donatello's David can be considered kiddie porn in some countries, and certainly Wilhelm von Gloeden's pictures, which were even burnt in the fascist thirties. Nowadays the owners of these magazines burn them themselves in their homes. There is a red line running through these actions: pictures of teenage boys have been denounced by the society, and so for no other reason than that the observer is a man. Homophobia, not concern about the children, lurks behind the kiddie porn legislations. Every intelligent social critic should fight them, or at least put the light on their real objectives.
source: Interview 'Sex destroys beauty' by Jaakko Stenros; Interviewing Karl Andersson; blog.destroyerjournal.com/images/kasino2low.jpg; Kasino A4; issue #5; April 2007